All Categories
Featured
Table of Contents
Secret difficulties include recognizing and handling these threats effectively, balancing employee needs with compliance, and adapting MTC guidelines for protected and cost-effective movement. If handled well, remote work can be a strategic benefit for multinationals, offering operational continuity and access to skill. Nevertheless, relying on out-of-date regulations could create liabilities, such as unexpected tax direct exposure and compliance concerns.
Daida Hadzic is Director, KPMG LLP.
Words by Kevin McKenna, Senior Consultant, EMIR Mirages often deceive the eye in the desert, appealing water and relief where there is none. The Middle East, at the moment, can appear intimidating to global organization leaders who mistakenly look at it as one homogeneous bloc. Unlike mirages, and regardless of geopolitical stress in the more comprehensive region, the Gulf Co-Operation Council (GCC) economies' potential is no illusion.
Numerous local leaders of international companies still struggle to unshackle themselves from mistaken beliefs and predispositions held by a worldwide HQ that frequently looks at the Middle East through a narrow keyhole. Worldwide spending plan holders' often misdirected viewpoints can cause missed out on chances and prevent growth. With over a decade of experience recommending local magnate in the Middle East, I've seen how critical it is to make the case for the region by concentrating on these five simple actions.
This location also runs very in a different way from our domestic market, so don't anticipate the exact same direct pathways to development and timelines." This strategy requires robust preparation, clear interaction, a deep regional network and an abundant understanding of the regional service environment because, eventually, you need to deliver on that assured development.
By resolving mistaken beliefs and engaging proactively, local CEOs can unlock the region's true capacity, changing viewed mirages into a sanctuary of opportunities waiting to be found.
Organize a session with our specialists to explore how YCP can assist you in addressing your company obstacles.
Similarly, regarding Israel's controversial policies of restricting humanitarian aid into Gaza, the Trump administration has followed Netanyahu's lead. Israel's complete blockade of Gaza from March 2 through mid-May triggered a dramatic deterioration in humanitarian conditions. In May, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli- and U.S.-backed alternative to the UN aid distribution system in Gaza, began operations at four distribution websites.
Taken together, these policies reflect 2 linked components of the Trump administration's approach to Gaza: a deference to Prime Minister Netanyahu's preferences and a deprioritization of humanitarian needs. The administration has not pushed back on the Israeli government's plans to inhabit Gaza City and by force leave Palestinians into a smaller area of Gaza.
They can best be recorded by unpacking how Israel and Saudi Arabiaeach with strong ties to the United Stateshave responded. Not surprisingly, their responses vary substantially in all 3 cases. Their reactions likewise reflect the growing variation between these two regional powers as they pursue commonly differing techniques for how to form the Middle East's emerging order.
It has indicated a willingness to use force whenever and anywhere threats arise. This determination has translated into ever-bolder military interventions across the region that have redrawn the Middle East's balance of power. Yet, Israel has not equated these military gains into withstanding strategic wins. For Saudi Arabiathe Arab world's existing center of gravitythe crucial for economic diversity has actually sustained a drive to de-escalate stress in the area, a push for post-conflict stabilization in the Levant, and aspirations to construct out business and trade ties throughout the Middle East and beyond.
As with Israel, nevertheless, whether and how Saudi Arabia equates its expanding leverage into lasting strategic gains remains to be seen. Israel was strongly supportive of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Going forward, Netanyahu will look to maintain U.S. support, especially if Iran starts to reconstruct its ballistic missile toolbox or restart enrichment. Israel has explained that it will strike Iran againideally with U.S. supportin either situation. Missing a clear U.S. "traffic signal" opposing additional Israeli military intervention in Iran, potentially matched with a U.S.Progressively, the Gulf views Israel, not Iran, as the main hazard to regional stability. Going forward, Riyadh will press hard for a diplomatic resolution to Iran's conflict with the United States and Israel. While Saudi Arabia most likely is heartened by Iran's weakened position, it sees with alarm the prospect of deepening interstate dispute between Israel and Iran.
Latest Posts
Future-Focused Operational Models for 2026 Ecosystems
Navigating GCC Market Strategy for 2026
Reviewing New GCC Research for Strategic Growth

